(Authentication Bypass via Logic & Timing – Educational Case Study)
Disclaimer
This article is written strictly for educational and defensive purposes.
All applications, endpoints, OTP formats, identifiers, and timings are fully anonymized.
No real user accounts or systems were harmed.
The goal is to explain why OTP ≠ security when logic is flawed.
Why OTP Systems Fail More Than Passwords
OTP systems are trusted blindly.
Developers think:
- “OTP means secure”
- “It expires quickly”
- “It’s random”
Attackers know better.
🔥 OTP systems fail not because of weak randomness,
but because of state, timing, and verification logic mistakes.
This post shows how I bypassed OTP verification entirely
➡️ no brute force
➡️ no guessing
➡️ no SMS interception
Just logic abuse.
Target Overview (Anonymized)
- Type: Web + mobile application
- OTP type: 6-digit numeric
- Use cases:
- Login
- Password reset
- Flow:
- Enter email / phone
- OTP sent
- Submit OTP
- Access granted
On paper: secure
In reality: fragile
Phase 1: Mapping the OTP Flow (This Is Everything)
I triggered OTP login.
Observed requests:
POST /api/auth/request-otp
POST /api/auth/verify-otp
Response from OTP request:
{
"status": "OTP_SENT",
"otp_id": "f3a9c2"
}
🚩 Red Flag #1
OTP verification tied to a client-controlled identifier (otp_id).
Phase 2: Understanding How Verification Worked
Verification request:
POST /api/auth/verify-otp
Content-Type: application/json
{
"otp_id": "f3a9c2",
"otp": "123456"
}
Normal behavior:
- Correct OTP → login
- Wrong OTP → error
But what mattered was what happens after verification, not before.
Phase 3: Testing OTP State Enforcement
After a successful OTP login, I noticed something odd.
The server returned:
{
"status": "VERIFIED",
"session_token": "eyJhbGciOi..."
}
But the OTP itself was not immediately invalidated.
That’s critical.
Phase 4: OTP Reuse (The Silent Killer)
I reused the same OTP request context.
Sent again:
POST /api/auth/verify-otp
Same payload.
Response:
{
"status": "VERIFIED",
"session_token": "new_token_here"
}
😐
Same OTP.
Same otp_id.
Multiple valid sessions.
Why This Is Dangerous
This means:
- OTP was treated as stateless
- Verification did not invalidate it
- Backend trusted that “OTP already used” wasn’t needed
OTP became:
A reusable password
Phase 5: Cross-Account OTP Abuse
Here’s where it got worse.
I requested OTP for Account A, got:
"otp_id": "f3a9c2"
Then I modified the verification request:
{
"otp_id": "f3a9c2",
"email": "victim@example.com",
"otp": "same_otp"
}
Response:
{
"status": "VERIFIED"
}
🚨
OTP was not bound to a specific user.
This enabled:
Login into other accounts using a valid OTP issued elsewhere
Phase 6: Race Condition Amplification (Advanced)
go through last post..
I combined both.
I sent multiple OTP verification requests in parallel.
Result:
- OTP accepted multiple times
- Sessions created simultaneously
- Rate limiting bypassed
This wasn’t brute force.
This was timing abuse.
Real-World Attack Chain
An attacker can:
1️⃣ Request OTP for their own account
2️⃣ Capture otp_id
3️⃣ Reuse OTP
4️⃣ Bind it to victim
5️⃣ Login as victim
6️⃣ Create persistent sessions
No alerts.
No password resets.
No failed attempts.
Why Rate Limiting Didn’t Help
| Defense | Why It Failed |
|---|---|
| Rate limit | OTP was valid |
| CAPTCHA | Correct flow |
| Expiry | Not enforced on use |
| OTP length | Irrelevant |
OTP security depends on state, not digits.
Root Cause Analysis
❌ Developer Mistakes
- OTP not invalidated after use
- OTP not bound to user identity
- OTP verification not atomic
- Relied on frontend flow order
- No replay protection
This is logic failure, not crypto failure.
✅ How OTP Systems Must Be Built
OTP rules (non-negotiable):
- OTP must be single-use
- OTP must be bound to user + action
- OTP must expire on:
- success
- failure threshold
- Verification must be atomic
- State must live server-side only
Anything less is bypassable.
How I Hunt OTP Bugs (Exact Playbook)
🔍 Checklist
1️⃣ Reuse OTP
2️⃣ Reuse otp_id
3️⃣ Swap users
4️⃣ Parallel verification
5️⃣ Skip verification step
6️⃣ Replay old OTPs
OTP bugs are everywhere because:
Devs test correct OTP only once
Attackers test everything else.
Tools Used
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Burp Suite | Flow manipulation |
| Repeater | OTP replay |
| Intruder | Parallel verification |
| Timing | Race exploitation |
Severity Assessment
| Impact | Level |
|---|---|
| Account takeover | Critical |
| MFA bypass | Critical |
| Detection | Very low |
| Abuse scale | High |
Severity:
Critical – Authentication Bypass
Why Companies Miss This
Because:
- OTP “feels secure”
- QA tests happy path only
- Logs show “successful login”
- No alerts triggered
By the time it’s noticed — it’s too late.
Final Thoughts
OTP is not security.
Correct OTP logic is.
And logic bugs don’t care how many digits you use.
